Matching using LB scale space
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixrcY_fX3gKRLRw6a5OFCqyN2UODaXcfs3Zn0OlZfjre0hLaVN0MhSClOXQfntR8beuKC3Ju4-luPd7hZb07-KeGSJHwcBstPIMGvhtkYwM4rpvISqvp42QbRJok1nYOPmpL0ZDwkdMH-P/s400/matching_SIFT_LB.png)
Matching using SIFT
We observe that the SIFT implementation performs better that the one using the LB approach. This is because the scale space we computed has different scales from the ones that are used by the implementation. Even we change the number of octaves and scales, internally the initial scale is not changed. The descriptors use this scale and it might be the reason the are badly computed.
No comments:
Post a Comment